Outreach Kit

Copy-ready messages for paid developer work

Use these short messages when applying to paid writing networks, pitching developer-tool teams, or opening a scoped conversation about Crawlee, Apify Actor, GitHub automation, or evidence-based workflow review work.

View services Read case study

Messages to adapt

Replace bracketed fields before sending. Keep the links public and do not include secrets, credentials, or private customer data.

Paid writing network application

Hello,

I write practical developer content backed by working code. My strongest areas are TypeScript, Crawlee / Apify, GitHub workflows, AI-assisted engineering operations, and evidence-based debugging.

Recent portfolio:
https://mysubb01.github.io/apify-github-issue-scout/

Case study:
https://mysubb01.github.io/apify-github-issue-scout/case-study.html

The sample includes a public TypeScript repo, Apify Actor adapter, article draft, pitch, release, and verification trail. I am interested in paid assignments where the final piece includes runnable code, clear tradeoffs, and reproducible evidence.

Relevant topics I can write:
- Building practical Crawlee / Apify workflows
- Turning scripts into Actor-ready packages
- GitHub automation and issue triage
- AI-assisted engineering workflows with human review
- Developer-tool tutorials backed by working repos

Happy to adapt to your editorial brief.

Developer-tool team pitch

Hi [team],

I noticed [specific product / docs / developer workflow]. I can help turn one practical use case into a working-code tutorial or small automation demo.

Example of my delivery style:
https://mysubb01.github.io/apify-github-issue-scout/case-study.html

Typical deliverables:
- scoped outline
- working TypeScript repo or code sample
- article draft or technical write-up
- verification commands and output notes

If useful, I can propose a small first sprint around [specific use case] in the 300-800 USD range.

Automation / Actor prototype offer

Hi [name],

I build small developer automation prototypes with a bias toward public proof and reproducible handoff.

Relevant sample:
https://mysubb01.github.io/apify-github-issue-scout/

For a Crawlee / Apify-style prototype, I can usually deliver:
- TypeScript implementation
- input schema and README
- sample output artifact
- verification notes
- concise handoff explaining limits and next steps

For a focused first sprint, the usual range is 400-1,200 USD depending on data source complexity and output requirements.

Short DM version

I built a public TypeScript/Crawlee portfolio sample that turns a noisy GitHub workflow into a working Apify Actor-ready demo, article draft, and buyer-facing case study:

https://mysubb01.github.io/apify-github-issue-scout/

I am available for paid technical writing, Crawlee/Apify prototypes, and GitHub workflow review. A small first sprint usually starts from 150-300 USD for review work or 300-800 USD for an article/demo package.

Links to include

Pick one or two links per message. The portfolio page is the best first link; the case study is the strongest proof link.

Portfolio page Main sample, service links, article draft, and Actor-ready proof. Case study Buyer-facing summary of problem, delivery, proof, and similar paid offers. Repository Source code, README, Actor metadata, and sample output. Paid inquiry Structured public GitHub intake for scoped work requests.